Resumen

Este informe sugiere que el que estudia la fecundidad, además de la información sobre mujeres, debe obtener información sobre hombres. Se presenta datos obtenidos de hombres en estudios de fecundidad y KAP (conocimientos, actitucles, y prácticas), y utilizando el tamaño actual de la familia como índice de fecundidad masculina, se examinan diferencias de fecundidad dentro y entre grupos de raza-religión-clase.

Cuando se compara los promedios actuales de tamaño familiar entre grupos clasficados de acuerdo a raza-religión-clase, subdivididos ya sea de acuerdo a la variable de conocimiento o a la variable de uso, no se puede identificar patrones específicos de diferencias en fecundidad. Pero el uso de una variable de motivación determina un patrón definido: en cada grupo de raza-religión-clase, el promedio actual del tamaño familiar del sector de alta motivación es significativamente más pequeño que el del sector caracterizado por una baja motivación.

Parece, además, que la motivación es un mejor índice de predicción del exceso de fecundidad que el conocimiento o el uso. Una persona tari motivada que sólo expenimenta un embarazo no deseado, es probable que no se exceda en el tamaño de familia que desea tener. Mś aún, este tipo de motivación no parece ser exclusivo de ninguna raza, clase o religión.

Summary

This report suggests that the student of fertility consider securing information from men as well as from women. Fertility and KAP data obtained from men are presented, and, using present family size as an index of male fertility, fertility differences within and among race-religion-class groups are examined.

When present family size means are compared among race-religion-class groups, dichotomized either on a knowledge variable or use variable, no specific patterns of differential fertility can be discerned. But the employment of a motivation variable results in a definite pattern: in each race-religion-class group, the mean present family size of the high-motivation sector is significantly smaller than that of the sector characterized by low motivation.

Motivation seems, moreover, to be a better predictor of excess fertility than knowledgibility or use. A person so motivated that he experiences no more than one unplanned pregnancy is not likely to exceed his desired family size. Furthermore, this type of motivation does not seem to be confined to any one race, class, or religion.

The text of this article is only available as a PDF.

References

1
P. K., Whelpton, & Clyde V., Kiser (
1946
).
Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility
.
New York
:
The Milbank Memorial Fund
.
2
Freedman, Ronald, Whelpton, Pascal K., & Campbell, Arthur A. (
1959
).
Family Planning, Sterility, and Population Growth
.
New York
:
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
.
3
Pascal K. Whelpton, Arthur A. Campbell, and John B, Patterson,Fertility and Family Planning in the United States (Princeton University Press, 1966).
4
Westoff, Charles F., Potter, Robert Gs., Sagi, Philip C., & Mishler, Elliot O (
1961
).
Family Growth in Metropolitan America
.
Princeton
:
Princeton University Press
.
5
Westoff, Charles F., Potter, Robert O, & Sagi, Philip C. (
1963
).
The Third Child: A Study in the Prediction of Fertility
.
Princeton
:
Princeton University Press
.
6
Harter, Carl L. (
1966
).
Rationality in Procreation and Differential Fertility
(pp.
33
54
).
New Orleans
:
Tulane University
.
7
Harter, Carl L., Ktsanes, Virginia, Fischer, Ann, & Beasley, Joseph D. (
1965
).
Family Survey of Metropolitan New Orleans Instruction Manual
Population and Family Studies Unit of the Division of Maternal and Child Health
.
New Orleans
:
Tulane University School of Medicine
.
8
Freedman, Ronald, Whelpton, Pascal K., & Campbell, Arthur A. (
1959
).
Family Planning, Sterility, and Population Growth
(pp.
26
26
).
New York
:
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
.
9
Whelpton, Campbell, and Patterson,op. cit., Pascal K. Whelpton, Arthur A. Campbell, and John B, Patterson,Fertility and Family Planning in the United States (Princeton University Press, 1966). p. 133.
10
P. K., Whelpton, & Clyde V., Kiser (
1946
).
Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility
(pp.
303
358
).
New York
:
The Milbank Memorial Fund
.
11
Westoff, Charles F., Mishler, Elliot G., & Kelly, E. Lowell (
1957
).
Preferences in Size of family and Eventual Fertility Twenty Years After
.
American Journal of Sociology
,
LXII
,
491
97
. 10.1086/222079
12
Methodology and Scores of Socio-economic Status
. (
1963
).
Washington, D.C.
:
Government Printing Office
.
13
Anders S. Lunde, “White-nonwhite Fertility Differentials in the United States,”Health, Education, and Welfare Indicators (September, 1965), pp. 1–15.
16
Himes, Norman E. (
1936
).
Medical History of Contraception
(pp.
87
87
).
Baltimore
:
The Williams and Wilkins Company
.
17
Westoff, Charles F., Potter, Robert Gs., Sagi, Philip C., & Mishler, Elliot O (
1961
).
Family Growth in Metropolitan America
(pp.
151
151
).
Princeton
:
Princeton University Press
.
18
P. K., Whelpton, & Clyde V., Kiser (
1946
).
Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility
(pp.
209
58
).
New York
:
The Milbank Memorial Fund
.