Abstract
The thesis of this study is that as a result of increased inequalities in welfare rules, the 1996 welfare reform act not only enhanced incentives for poor families to move but also (and perhaps more important) created disincentives for them to stay in “race to the bottom” states. In testing this thesis, we evaluated the mediating and moderating roles of state economic development and family structure. We merged data from three main sources: the 1996–1999 panel of the Survey of Income and Program Participation, the Urban Institute’s Welfare Rules Database, and state economic data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Modeling both destination (pull) and departure (push) effects of welfare policy measures and selected covariates in a nested discrete-time event-history migration analysis, we found robust support for the thesis that stringency in state welfare-eligibility and behavior-related rules stimulated interstate out-migration of poor families in the United States. However, poor families were not drawn to states with relatively more-lenient welfare rules, although stringency in state welfare dollar benefits inhibited in-migration and state unemployment patterns may have conditioned the migration effects of welfare-reform rules on the choice of destination. Single mothers were not more directly affected by welfare-eligibility and behavior-related rules than were poor married couples.
References
Allison, P.D. (
1995
). Survival Analysis Using the SAS System, A Practical Guide
. Cary, NC
: SAS Institute
.Beale, C. (
1971
). Rural-Urban Migration of Blacks: Past and Future
. American Journal of Agricultural Economics
, 219
, 302
–307
. 10.2307/1237447Blank, R. (
1988
). The Effect of Welfare and Wage Levels on the Location Decisions of Female-Headed Households
. Journal of Urban Economics
, 24
, 186
–211
. 10.1016/0094-1190(88)90038-1Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (
1963
). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research
. Chicago
: Rand McNally
.Cebula, R. (
1979
). A Survey of the Literature on the Migration-Impact of State and Local Policies
. Public Finance
, 34
, 39
–84
.Crowder, K. (
2001
). Racial Stratification in the Actuation of Mobility Expectations: Microlevel Impacts of Racially Restrictive Housing Markets
. Social Forces
, 79
, 1377
–96
. 10.1353/sof.2001.0035Cushing, B. (
1993
). The Effect of the Social Welfare System on Metropolitan Migration in the U.S., by Income Group, Gender, and Family Structure
. Urban Studies
, 30
, 325
–38
. 10.1080/00420989320080321DaVanzo, J. (
1981
). Microeconomic Approaches to Studying Migration Decisions
. In G.F. De Jong, & R.W. Gardner (Eds.), Migration Decision Making
(pp. 90
–130
). New York
: Pergamon Press
.De Jong, G., & Donnelly, W. (
1973
). Public Welfare and Migration
. Social Science Quarterly
, 54
, 329
–44
.De Jong, G. and D. Graefe. 2002. “Welfare Reform and Migration: Moving to Benefits; Moving From Restrictions.” Working Paper 318. Northwestern University-University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
De Jong, G., D. Graefe, and T. St. Pierre. 2001. “Measuring Interstate Welfare Policy Variations: Inequalities and Change in Ten Policy Dimensions over the Reform Implementation Period.” Paper presented at the 2001 APPAM Annual Research Conference, Washington, DC, November.
Dublin, T. (
1998
). Working-Class Families Respond to Industrial Decline: Migration From the Pennsylvania Anthracite Region Since 1920
. International Labor and Working Class History
, 54
, 40
–56
. 10.1017/S0147547900006207Dye, T. (
1990
). The Policy Consequences of Intergovernmental Competition
. Cato Journal
, 10
, 59
–73
.Ellwood, D.T. (
2000
). The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage, and Living Arrangements
. National Tax Journal
, 53
, 1063
–105
.Enchautegui, M.E. (
1997
). Welfare Payments and Other Economic Determinants of Female Migration
. Journal of Labor Economics
, 15
, 529
–54
. 10.1086/209871Erwin, M., Blanchard, T., Tolbert, C., Nucci, A., & Lyson, T. (
2004
). Why People Stay: The Impact of the Community Context on Nonmigration in the USA
. Population-E
, 59
, 567
–92
.Fischer, P.A., Martin, R., & Straubhaar, T. (
1997
). Should I Stay or Should I Go?
. In T. Hammer, G. Brochmann, K. Tamas, & T. Faist (Eds.), International Migration, Immobility, and Development
(pp. 49
–90
). Oxford, England
: Berg Press
.Frey, W., Liaw, K.-L., Xie, Y., & Carlson, M. (
1996
). Interstate Migration of the US Poverty Population: Immigration ’Pushes’ and Welfare Magnet “Pulls.”
. Population and Environment: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
, 17
, 491
–533
.Gramlich, E., & Lauren, D. (
1984
). Migration and Income Redistribution Responsibilities
. Journal of Human Resources
, 19
, 484
–511
. 10.2307/145944Hanson, R. and J. Hartman. 1994. “Do Welfare Magnets Attract?” Discussion Paper No. 1029-94. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Kaestner, R., Kaushal, N., & Van Ryzin, G. (
2001
). Migration Consequences of Welfare Reform
. Cambridge, MA
: National Bureau of Economic Research
.Levine, P., & Zimmerman., D. (
1995
). An Empirical Analysis of the Welfare Magnet Debate Using the NLSY
. Cambridge, MA
: National Bureau of Economic Research
.Long, L. (
1974
). Poverty Status and Receipt of Welfare Among Migrants and Non-Migrants in Large Cities
. American Sociological Review
, 39
, 46
–56
. 10.2307/2094275Massey, D.S., Arnago, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J.E. (
1998
). Contemporary Theories of International Migration
Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium
. New York
: Oxford University Press
.McFadden, D. (
1974
). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour
. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics
(pp. 105
–42
). New York
: Academic Press
.Meyer, B.D., & Rosenbaum, D.T. (
2000
). Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and Its Effects
. National Tax Journal
, 53
, 1027
–61
.Meyers, M., Gornick, J., & Peck, L. (
2001
). Packaging Support for Low-Income Families: Policy Variation Across the United States
. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
, 20
, 457
–83
. 10.1002/pam.1003Moffitt, R. (
1992
). Incentive Effect of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review
. Journal of Economic Literature
, 30
, 1
–61
.SAS Institute. n.d. “Chapter 15, The MDC Procedure.” Documentation for the 8.2 Release of the MDC Procedure (pdf). Available on-line at http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/doc.html#ETS.
Schram, S., Nitz, L., & Krueger, G. (
1998
). Without Cause or Effect: Reconsidering Welfare Migration as a Policy Problem
. American Journal of Political Science
, 42
, 210
–30
. 10.2307/2991753Schram, S., & Soss, J. (
1999
). The Real Value of Welfare: Why Poor Families Do Not Migrate
. Politics and Society
, 27
, 39
–66
. 10.1177/0032329299027001003Speare, A., Kobrin, F., & Kingkade, W. (
1982
). The Influence of Socioeconomic Bonds and Satisfaction on Interstate Migration
. Social Forces
, 61
, 551
–74
. 10.2307/2578241Sternlieb, G., & Indik, B. (
1973
). The Ecology of Welfare: Housing and the Welfare Crisis in New York City
. New Brunswick, NJ
: Transaction Books
.Train, K. (
2003
). Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation
. New York
: Cambridge University Press
.Walker, J. 1994. “Migration Among Low-Income Households: Helping the Witch Doctors Reach Consensus.” Discussion Paper No. 1031-94. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
© Population Association of America 2005
2005
