Abstract
We review the logic underlying margin-free analyses of sex segregation arrays. In the course of our review, we show that the Karmel-MacLachlan decomposition does not live up to its margin-free billing, as the index upon which it rests, Ip, is itself margin-sensitive. Moreover, because the implicit individualism of D is necessarily inconsistent with margin-free analysis, the field would do well to abandon not merely the Karmel-MacLachlan decomposition but all related efforts to purge marginal dependencies from D-inspired measures. The criticisms that Watts (1998) levels against our log-multiplicative approach are likewise unconvincing. We demonstrate that our preferred models pass the test of organizational equivalence, that the “problem⤎ of zero cells can be solved by applying well-developed methods for ransacking incomplete or sparse tables, and that simple log-multiplicative models can be readily devised to analyze disaggregate arrays. We illustrate these conclusions by analyzing a new cross-national archive of detailed segregation data.
Occupational Segregation, Methodological Individualism, Segregation Index, Zero Cell, Segregation Profile
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
References
Abrahamson, M., & Sigelman, L. (
1987
). Occupational Sex Segregation in Metropolitan Areas
. American Sociological Review
, 52
, 588
–97
. 10.2307/2095596Bishop, Y.M., Fienberg, S.E., & Holland, P.W. (
1975
). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice
. Cambridge
: MIT Press
.Blau, F.D., & Hendricks, W.E. (
1979
). Occupational Segregation and Labor Market Discrimination
. In B. Reskin (Ed.), Sex Segregation in the Workplace
(pp. 117
–43
). Washington, DC
: National Academy Press
.Charles, M. Forthcoming. “Structure, Culture, and Sex Segregation in Western Europe.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 16:89–116
Charles, M., & Grusky, D.B. (
1995
). Models for Describing the Underlying Structure of Sex Segregation
. American Journal of Sociology
, 100
, 931
–71
. 10.1086/230605Charles, M. and D.B. Grusky. Forthcoming. Sex Segregation in Comparative Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Clogg, C.C., & Eliason, S.R. (
1987
). Some Common Problems in Log-Linear Analysis
. Sociological Methods and Research
, 16
, 8
–44
. 10.1177/0049124187016001002Elias, P. and M. Birch. 1993. “Establishment of Community-Wide Occupational Statistics.” Working paper, Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.
Elias, P. and M. Birch. 1994. “Harmonising Occupational Information Across the European Union: Progress on the Labour Force Survey.” Working paper, Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.
Fuchs, V.R. (
1975
). A Note on Sex Segregation in Professional Occupations
. Explorations in Economic Research
, 2
, 105
–11
.Gibbs, J.P. (
1965
). Occupational Differentiation of Negroes and Whites in the United States
. Social Forces
, 44
, 159
–65
. 10.2307/2575622Gross, E. (
1968
). Plus ca change…? The Sexual Structure of Occupations Over Time
. Social Problems
, 16
, 198
–208
. 10.1525/sp.1968.16.2.03a00070Jacobs, J.A. (
1993
). Theoretical and Measurement Issues in the Study of Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Research Note
. European Sociological Review
, 9
, 325
–30
.Jacobs, J.A., & Lim, S.T. (
1992
). Trends in Occupational and Industrial Sex Segregation in 56 Countries, 1960–1980
. Work and Occupations
, 19
, 450
–86
. 10.1177/0730888492019004006James, D.R., & Taeuber, K.E. (
1985
). Measures of Segregation
. In N.B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology
(pp. 1
–32
). New York
: Jossey-Bass
.Karmel, T., & MacLachlan, M. (
1988
). Occupational Sex Segregation— Increasing or Decreasing?
. Economic Record
, 64
, 187
–95
. 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1988.tb02057.xOppenheimer, V.K. (
1970
). The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing its Growth and Changing Composition
. Berkeley
: Institute for International Studies
.Stinchcombe, A.L. (
1965
). Social Structure and Organizations
. In G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations
(pp. 142
–93
). Chicago
: Rand-McNalley
.Tienda, M., Smith, S.A., & Ortiz, V. (
1987
). Industrial Restructuring, Gender Segregation, and Sex Differences in Earnings
. American Sociological Review
, 52
, 195
–210
. 10.2307/2095448Watts, M.J. (
1992
). How Should Occupational Sex Segregation be Measured?
. Work, Employment, and Society
, 6
, 475
–87
.Watts, M.J. (
1993
). Explaining Trends in Occupational Segregation: Some Comments
. European Sociological Review
, 9
, 315
–19
.Watts, M.J. (
1997
). The Measurement of Occupational Gender Segregation
. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society
, 160
, 141
–45
. 10.1111/1467-985X.00050Watts, M.J. (
1998
). Occupational Gender Segregation: Index Measurement and Econometric Modeling
. Demograpky
, 35
, 489
–96
. 10.2307/3004016Weeden, K. (
1998
). Revisiting Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States, 1910–1990: Results From a Log-Linear Approach
. Demography
, 35
, 475
–87
. 10.2307/3004015Weeden, K. and J. Sarensen. Forthcoming. “Two-Dimensional Models of Sex Segregation: Industries and Occupations.” In Sex Segregation in Comparative Perspective, M. Charles and D.B. Grusky. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
White, M.J. (
1985
). Segregation and Diversity Measures in Population Distribution
. Population Index
, 52
, 198
–221
. 10.2307/3644339© Population Association of America 1998
1998
