Abstract

The production of social statistics has been challenged in certain West European nations by the “privacy issue.” Privacy advocates contend thatcomputerized data files containing information about individuals endanger personal privacy and other civil liberties. The privacy issue has taken two forms: anti-census campaigns and data protection systems. Although those responsible for statistical data have traditionally safeguarded their records, they areoften drawn into this issue. Increasingly, they have had to deal with the sociopolitical environment through legislative liaisons, lawyers, and advertising agencies. They have also had to revise data collection and processing procedures. In some situations, they have had to suspend censuses and surveys.

Statistical Agency, Data Protection, Privacy Issue, Statistical Bureau, Advertising Agency
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.

References

Aly, G., & Roth, K. H. (
1984
).
Die Rest/ose Erfassung: Volkszählen, Identifizieren, Aussondern im Nationalsozialismus
.
Berlin
:
Rotbuch
.
Google Scholar
 
Bennett, C. 1986. Regulating the Computer. A Comparative Study of Personal Data Protection. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, Dept. of Political Science.
Bull, H. P. (
1984
).
Datenschutz oder die Angst vor dem Computer
.
Munich
:
Piper
.
Google Scholar
 
Bulmer, M. (
1979
).
Parliament and the British census since 1970
. In M. Bulmer (Ed.),
Censuses, Surveys and Privacy
(pp.
158
–
170
).
London
:
Macmillan
.
Google Scholar
 
Bulmer, M. (
1986
).
A controversial census topic: Race and ethnicity in the British census
.
Journal of Official Statistics
,
2
,
471
–
480
.
Google Scholar
PubMed
 
Burnham, D. (
1983
).
Rise of the Computer State
.
New York
:
Random House
.
Google Scholar
 
Butz, W. P. 1984. Data Confidentiality and Public Perceptions: The Case of the European Censuses. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis.
Dalenius, T. (
1977
).
Toward a methodology for statistical disclosure control
.
Statistisk Tidskrift [Statistical Review], Ser. 3
,
15
,
429
–
444
.
Google Scholar
 
Dalenius, T. 1986. The 1986 Invasion of Privacy Debate in Sweden. Working Paper, Brown University, Dept. of Statistics.
Data protection becoming worldwide
 (
1986
).
Transnational Data Report
,
9
(
1
),
29
–
30
.
Flaherty, D. H. (
1986
).
Data protection and the statistical community
Eurostat News: Protection of Privacy, Automatic Data Processing and Progress in Statistical Documentation
(pp.
239
–
258
). spec. ed.
Luxembourg
:
Eurostat
.
Google Scholar
 
Paas, G., & Wauschkuhn, U. (
1985
).
Datenzugang, Datenschutz und Anonymisierung: Analysepotential und Identifizierbarkeit von Anonymisierten Individualdaten
.
Munich
:
Oldenbourg
.
Google Scholar
 
Schindel, J. (
1984
).
Germany declares self-determination over personal data
.
Transnational Data Report
,
7
(
5
),
359
–
361
.
Google Scholar
 
Taeuber, C. (
1979
).
Invasion of privacy: The case of the United States Census
. In M. Bulmer (Ed.),
Censuses, Surveys and Privacy
(pp.
170
–
175
).
London
:
Macmillan
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
Thygesen, L. 1983. Methodological Problems Connected With a Sociodemographic Statistical System Based on Administrative Records. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Statistical Institute, Madrid.
Werner, J., & Sudfeld, E. (
1986
).
Protection of privacy, automatic data processing and progress in statistical documentation in the Federal Republic of Germany
Eurostat News: Protection of Privacy, Automatic Data Processing and Progress in Statistical Documentation
(pp.
99
–
132
). spec. ed.
Luxembourg
:
Eurostat
.
Google Scholar
 
© Population Association of America 1988
1988
Issue Section:
Commentary and Comment