Resumen

Este artículo presenia una crítica al trabajo “A New Estimateof theNegro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the U.S., 1930–60” publicado en el volumen I deDemografía. El autor tiene serias reservas en relación a los supuestos bajo los cuales descansa el procedimento que se presenta en el artículo mencionado y sugiere quelos resultados no son necesariamente mejores que los anteriormente existentes. Los autores—Bogue, Misra y Dandekar—incluyen una breve respuesta, defendiendo su trabajo.

Negro Population, Registered Birth, Sample Count, Census Count, Complete Count

References

1
Donald J. Bogue, Bhaskar D. Misra, and D. P. Dandekar, “A New Estimate of the Negro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the United States, 1930–60,”Demography, I, No. 1, 1964.
2
Bogue, Donald J., Misra, Bhaskar D., & Dandekar, D. P. (
1964
).
A New Estimate of the Negro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the United States, 1930–60
.
Demography
,
I
(
No. 1
),
340
–
340
.
Google Scholar
 
3
Bogue, Donald J., Misra, Bhaskar D., & Dandekar, D. P. (
1964
).
A New Estimate of the Negro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the United States, 1930–60
.
Demography
,
I
(
No. 1
),
340
–
340
.
Google Scholar
 
4
Bogue, Donald J., Misra, Bhaskar D., & Dandekar, D. P. (
1964
).
A New Estimate of the Negro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the United States, 1930–60
.
Demography
,
I
(
No. 1
),
340
–
340
.
Google Scholar
 
5
Bogue, Donald J., Misra, Bhaskar D., & Dandekar, D. P. (
1964
).
A New Estimate of the Negro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the United States, 1930–60
.
Demography
,
I
(
No. 1
),
340
–
340
.
Google Scholar
 
7
Bogue, Donald J., Misra, Bhaskar D., & Dandekar, D. P. (
1964
).
A New Estimate of the Negro Population and Negro Vital Rates in the United States, 1930–60
.
Demography
,
I
(
No. 1
),
344
–
344
.
Google Scholar
 
8
Donald S. Akers, “Estimating Net Census Undercount in 1960 Using Analytical Techniques” (paper presented at the 1962 annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Madison, Wisconsin, May 1962).
9
Ibid., Donald S. Akers, “Estimating Net Census Undercount in 1960 Using Analytical Techniques” (paper presented at the 1962 annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Madison, Wisconsin, May 1962). p. 5.
11
Coale, Ansley J. (
1955
).
The Population of the United States in 1950 Classified by Age, Sex, and Color: A Revision of Census Figures
.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
,
L
(
No. 269
),
17
–
17
.
Google Scholar
 
12
Coale, Ansley J. (
1955
).
The Population of the United States in 1950 Classified by Age, Sex, and Color: A Revision of Census Figures
.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
,
L
(
No. 269
),
4
–
5
.
Google Scholar
 
22
B-M-D, p. 357.
23
Ibid. B-M-D, p. 355.
24
Ibid. B-M-D, P. 355.
25
Coale, Ansley J. (
1955
).
The Population of the United States in 1950 Classified by Age, Sex, and Color: A Revision of Census Figures
.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
,
L
(
No. 269
),
17
–
17
.
Google Scholar
 
26
Akers,op. cit. Donald S. Akers, “Estimating Net Census Undercount in 1960 Using Analytical Techniques” (paper presented at the 1962 annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Madison, Wisconsin, May 1962).
27
B-M-D apparently took Akers' estimates from a paper by Taeuber and Hansen which summarizes Akers' results; see Conrad Taeuber and Morris H. Hansen, “A Preliminary Evaluation of the 1960 Census of Population and Housing” (paper presented at the 1963 annual meetings of the American Statistical Association, Cleveland, Ohio, September, 1963).
1
U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Negro Population: March, 1964,”Current Population Reports Population Characteristics (Series P-20, No. 137, May 6, 1965).
© Population Association of American 1965
1965

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview