Abstract

The present study examines the relationship between relative income (i.e., actual income in relation to the expected income of one’s socioeconomic group) and fertility, using data collected by the 1967-1968Canadian Family Growth Study (Balakrishnan et al., 1975). We broaden the tests of relative income beyond cumulative fertility to spacing behavior and then examine some of the assumptions included in the relative income model of fertility. Results of the tests, in brief, are as follows: (a) Relative income is found to be more closely related to spacing than to cumulative fertility; and (b) the relationship between relative income and fertility is strongest among those couples who plan their life ahead and have a high level of education and occupation, and when temporal alignment is brought between the measures of relative income and fertility. For the relative income model to receive confirmation, it was specified that the following hypotheses must be confirmed: (a) that fertility behavior would vary positively with relative income but the fertility norm would show no relationship with relative income; and (b) that consumption norms and behavior would show no relationship with relative income. The outcome of these tests are in the expected direction, giving support to the relative income model. In addition, there is some evidence of predictive capability of the relative income model for correlative behavior.

The text of this article is only available as a PDF.

References

Balakrishnan, T. R., Kantner, J. F., & Allingham, J. D. (
1975
).
Fertility and Family Planning in a Canadian Metropolis
.
Montreal
:
McGill-Queen’s University Press
.
Bernhardt, E. M. (
1972
).
Fertility and Economic Status: Some Recent Findings on Differentials in Sweden
.
Population Studies
,
26
,
175
184
. 10.2307/2173576
Banks, James A. (
1954
).
Prosperity and Parenthood
.
London
:
Routledge and Paul
.
Chaudhury, Rafiqul H. (
1972
).
A Multivariate Analysis of Relative Income’s Relationship to Fertility. Unpublished thesis
.
Baltimore
:
School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University
.
Easterlin, Richard A. (
1969
).
Toward a Socio-Economic Theory of Fertility: A Survey of Recent Research on Economic Factors in American Fertility
. In Samuel J. Behrman, L. Corsa, & R. Freedman (Eds.),
Fertility and Family Planning: A World View
(pp.
127
156
).
Ann Arbor
:
The University of Michigan Press
.
Easterlin, Richard A. (
1972
).
Relative Economic Status and the American Fertility Swing
.
Philadelphia
:
University of Pennsylvania
.
Edin, Karl A., & Hutchinson, E. P. (
1935
).
Studies of Differential Fertility in Sweden
.
London
:
P. S. King and Son
.
Freedman, D. (
1963
).
The Relation of Economic Status to Fertility
.
American Economic Review
,
53
,
416
426
.
Griffith, Jeanne E. (
1973
).
Contemporary U.S. Family Size Norms. Unpublished dissertation
.
Baltimore
:
The Johns Hopkins University
.
Kunz, P. R. (
1965
).
The Relation ofIncome and Fertility
.
Journal of Marriage and the Family
,
27
,
509
513
. 10.2307/350191
Osteria, Trinidad (
1972
).
Child-Spacing and Economic Position of the Family in Toronto
.
Baltimore
:
The Johns Hopkins University
.
Whelpton, Pascal K., & Patterson, J. E. (
1966
).
Fertility and Family Planning in the United States
.
Princeton
:
Princeton University Press
.
Winer, B. J. (
1962
).
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
.
New York
:
McGraw-Hill Book Company
.