Abstract
A causal model. relating population size, economic development, military power and antinatal population policy is tested using data from 83 developing nations. The statistical findings are interpreted as supporting two hypotheses: (1) population size is a major determinant of military power; and (2) military power is a minor determinant of anti-natal population policy.
Power Optimum, Family Planning Program, Population Policy, Central African Republic, Military Expenditure
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
References
Berelson, Bernard (
1969
). National Family Planning Programs: Where We Stand
. In S. J. Behrman, Leslie Corsa, & Ronald Freedman (Eds.), Fertility and Family Planning: A World View
(pp. 341
–387
). Ann Arbor
: The University of Michigan Press
.Davis, Kingsley (
1958
). Population and Power in the Free World
. In Philip M. Hauser (Ed.), Population and World Politics
(pp. 193
–213
). Glencoe
: The Free Press
.Munger, Edwin S. (
1972
). Discussion of Dr. Heisel’s Paper
. In Harrison Brown, & Edward Hutchings (Eds.), Are Our Descendents Doomed? Technological Change and Population Growth
(pp. 197
–200
). New York
: The Viking Press
.Nortman, Dorothy (
1972
). Population and Family Planning Programs: A Factbook
. New York
: The Population Council
.Organski, Katherine, & Organski, A. F. K. (
1961
). Population and World Power
. New York
: Knopf
.World Population Data Sheet
. (1972
). Washington
: Population Reference Bureau
.Stycos, J. Mayone (
1971
). Ideology, Faith and Family Planning in Latin America: Studies in Public and Private Opinion on Fertility Control
. New York
: McGraw-Hill
.Sweezy, Alan (
1972
). Attitudes Toward Limitation
. In Harrison Brown, & Alan Sweezy (Eds.), Population Perspective, 1971
(pp. 7
–27
). San Francisco
: Freeman and Cooper, Company, Publishers
.World Military Expenditures, 1971
. (1972
). Washington, D.C.
: U. S. Government Printing Office
.© Population Association of America 1973
1973
