A causal model. relating population size, economic development, military power and antinatal population policy is tested using data from 83 developing nations. The statistical findings are interpreted as supporting two hypotheses: (1) population size is a major determinant of military power; and (2) military power is a minor determinant of anti-natal population policy.
Power Optimum, Family Planning Program, Population Policy, Central African Republic, Military Expenditure
The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
Berelson, Bernard (
National Family Planning Programs: Where We Stand. In S. J. Behrman, Leslie Corsa, & Ronald Freedman (Eds.),
Fertility and Family Planning: A World View(pp.
The University of Michigan Press.
Davis, Kingsley (
Population and Power in the Free World. In Philip M. Hauser (Ed.),
Population and World Politics(pp.
The Free Press.
Munger, Edwin S. (
Discussion of Dr. Heisel’s Paper. In Harrison Brown, & Edward Hutchings (Eds.),
Are Our Descendents Doomed? Technological Change and Population Growth(pp.
The Viking Press.
Nortman, Dorothy (
Population and Family Planning Programs: A Factbook.
The Population Council.
Organski, Katherine, & Organski, A. F. K. (
Population and World Power.
World Population Data Sheet. (
Population Reference Bureau.
Stycos, J. Mayone (
Ideology, Faith and Family Planning in Latin America: Studies in Public and Private Opinion on Fertility Control.
Sweezy, Alan (
Attitudes Toward Limitation. In Harrison Brown, & Alan Sweezy (Eds.),
Population Perspective, 1971(pp.
Freeman and Cooper, Company, Publishers.
World Military Expenditures, 1971. (
U. S. Government Printing Office.
© Population Association of America 1973