Search Results for human/nonhuman relations

... and contact can remind us, for example, of all that can interfere with or defeat intended goals, particularly in a lifeworld of multisited human and nonhuman agency. Overall, this response to Viveiros de Castro takes an aesthetico-political approach to his article. It comments on the important work...

...) of tradition the in mean, (I dichotomies ditional “enemy,” is used to bring a an “self” other,into existence. I will human deliberately use a set of tra- warfare, in and nonhumans; and humans between lation and “other” develop especially complex relations. Shamanism deals with the re...

....” [email protected] Copyright © 2023 by Duke University Press 2022 Richard Rorty Nicholas Gaskill science studies “post‐truth,” human/nonhuman relations Interest in the ideas of Richard Rorty has hit a high watermark and shows no sign of abating. The last few years alone have seen...

... that knit together human and nonhuman actors. The notion of process is crucial to this model, since what matters is that relations are always being reconstituted. As Latour writes in Down to Earth (2018), “there are not organisms on one side and an environment on the other, but a coproduction by both...

... of humans and nonhumans in scientific practice and elsewhere, thus allowing him to understand how laboratory configurations, at least some of the time, succeed in making certain entities, relations, and processes more real . When Latour ridicules phrases like objective reality , it is therefore...

... of thing than STS scholarship ever could be. Several contributors to the installments of this symposium refer to Rorty's ideas about humans and nonhumans, as if sensing that something is at stake between Rorty and Latour; and I concur. Rorty is a thoroughgoing nominalist and Latour is an empiricist...

... distinguish from each other. The first dimension entails varying the varying entails dimension first other. The each from distinguish to learn to need we that dimensions two within variations of number a register experience. everyday an indeed is that nonhuman: or human whether beings...

... - - - - - -   property one only contain to seems category first The some. by only or humans all by oneis possessed citedproperty the whetheron depending sorts, a in basic difference moral into These to entitlements. divide examples two justify ences between humans and nonhumans...

... that it involves a dependence relation between human and nonhuman. For Rorty, there is no such representational relation—no such epistemic or linguistic relation—between us and the world. There is only a causal relation, which means that the world is an obstacle to which we adapt. 41 Knowledge and language...

..., and emergent back-and-forth between a multiplicity of actors, variously human and nonhuman. The author's concern in this new essay is with apparently stable and dependable technologies, such as cars, computers, and power stations, which he conceptualizes here as “islands of stability” in the flux of becoming...

... that a key difference between the networks estab- lished in the natural sciences and those in the humanities is that, while the former are extended and made durable by an extremely wide range of nonhuman actors, the latter have almost no resource except for texts, which are notoriously difficult to stabilize...

... time betraying insensitivity to the particular animals that the text dis- cusses. On the other hand, a writer may appear to buttress the human/nonhuman divide, while revealing unusual responsiveness to nonhuman entities. Hache and Latour’s kind of form-content analysis thus relies upon...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...

... these that nonhumans and humans between distinction the to opposition In humanity. on reflection nurture they as insofar only animals upon calling nonhumans, to relation their in traditional very remain otherness of losophers phi that shows author the him, including time...