1-20 of 30 Search Results for

historical vs. philosophical analysis

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2024) 30 (2): 152–162.
Published: 01 May 2024
... in ritual, offers a way to assert and live with opposites such as good and evil, life and death, simultaneously. [email protected] Copyright © 2024 by Duke University Press 2024 Julian of Norwich paradox the problem of evil mysticism historical vs. philosophical analysis My mother...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 151.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 152.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 152–153.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 153–154.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 154.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 155–156.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 157.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 158.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 158–159.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 159–160.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 160.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 161.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 161.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2004) 10 (1): 162–163.
Published: 01 January 2004
...- sophical dichotomies (fact vs. value, objective vs. subjective, mind vs. matter) and then, typically, tried to eliminate one side of the dichotomy in favor of the other. From Aristotle to Dewey, philosophers who have been dubious about the posturing and paradox-mongering of their flashier colleagues...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2023) 29 (1): 72–85.
Published: 01 January 2023
... of the relation of mind and world and to the new problem of the relation of language and world (which is the basis of further controversies involving “realism” and/vs. “antirealism,” or “realism” and/vs. “relativism”), it being “useless to ask whether one vocabulary rather than another is closer to reality.” 38...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2021) 27 (1): 114–115.
Published: 01 January 2021
... a hierophant or at least conferred distinct economic advan- tages. Moreover, not all writing systems (pictographs vs. glottographic scripts, for instance) are similarly imbricated with techniques of visualization. In all such cases, comparison is instructive insofar as it denaturalizes categories of analysis...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2007) 13 (2-3): 191–205.
Published: 01 August 2007
... scientists to model the study of human behavior on the natural sciences. social by attempts of criticism his for known Taylor, philosopher Charles ofa work on the old,essay That tendencyapparent,isalien. his and forin example, ideas vs. behavior universals, vs. particulars sciences, vs...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2007) 13 (2-3): 531–535.
Published: 01 August 2007
...: of ; 2004 Deconstruction vs. Postmod Deconstruction...
Journal Article
Common Knowledge (2002) 8 (3): 582–594.
Published: 01 August 2002
... instants, a single-use camera pro- ducing atoms of recollection that are not only unsuitable for enlargement and standardization, but seem even to take pride in their absolutely idiomatic char- World the vs. Poetry...