One of the surprising outcomes of the 2008 economic crisis in Spain has been the emergence of Antonio Gramsci as a fashionable figure. This “all-purpose Gramsci” forces us to regain some historical perspective on the Spanish reception of his ideas. In the 1970s, different clans within the camp opposing Franco's regime came up with their own self-serving—liberal, Leninist, autonomist, Eurocommunist—versions of Gramsci. The theoretical discussion about these uses and abuses of Gramsci gravitated around the Italian communist's idealist epistemology and the role of “ideology” and “culture” within it. Since 2008, we find two different approaches to this same Gramscian issue: one that peddles a political theory of discursive rearrangement of a semi-emptied and adjustable social landscape; and a second one that embraces a movementist, horizontal, and anti-state organizational work on the ground. The political efficiency of these two approaches is significantly impaired by the lack of a sober historical explanation of why the rapprochement with Gramsci only during times of economic turmoil and political rupture is highly paradoxical.
The Gramscian Moment of the Spanish Crisis
Antonio Gómez López-Quiñones is an associate professor of Spanish and comparative literature at Dartmouth College. His fields of research are European Marxism, (neo)populism, cultural reactions to the Great Recession, and the historical memory of the Spanish Civil War. He is the author of three books and has edited several collective volumes on the concept of precarity, the cultural communist imaginary in Spain, and, more recently, the dialogue between hermeneutics and Marxism. Currently, he is working on the first comprehensive study of the reception of Gramsci's thought in the Iberian Peninsula.
Antonio Gómez López-Quiñones; The Gramscian Moment of the Spanish Crisis. boundary 2 1 August 2021; 48 (3): 55–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-9155732
Download citation file: