Since 1950, the Chinese government has determined the status and position of Tibetans, but it has not won the battle for Tibetans’ hearts and minds. Ongoing Tibetan resistance under Chinese rule points to serious fissures in the Chinese state’s ideological and cultural project of “liberating” Tibet. Wang Hui’s article “The ‘Tibetan Question’ East and West: Orientalism, Regional Ethnic Autonomy, and the Politics of Dignity” analyzes the March 2008 “riots” in and around Lhasa in order to understand the impediments to a real solution to the crisis in Tibet. This piece suggests that although Wang Hui offers productive ways of moving beyond the status quo, his analysis of Tibet is limited by multiple ideological contradictions that ultimately fail to lift Tibet out of the advanced/backward binary that typifies late nineteenth-century orientalism.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1, 2019
Issue Editors
Research Article|
August 01 2019
Dialectics of Sovereignty, Compromise, and Equality in the Discourse on the “Tibetan Question”
boundary 2 (2019) 46 (3): 153–179.
Citation
Tsering Wangmo Dhompa; Dialectics of Sovereignty, Compromise, and Equality in the Discourse on the “Tibetan Question”. boundary 2 1 August 2019; 46 (3): 153–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-7614195
Download citation file:
Advertisement
101
Views