Search Results for doing without science

... forest management skill doing without science ...

... of erosion control is centered on performance and agency rather than cognition; it is “doing without science.” forest management skill doing without science ...

... together without doing away with irreconcilable tensions between them. The issue is one of ambivalence and mixed feelings but, even more centrally, that involving epistemological work on the possibilities and impossibilities of knowing. Ambiguity means that things can be both and . This chapter explores...

...—and the book—ends with the need to confront the nightmare versions of one’s wishes without giving up on the generative power of political imagination. Utopia dystopia feminist utopias political imagination science fiction feminism ...

... became entangled in a cultural politics of science, where its “Africanity” was defined and defended (or denounced). The chapter proposes to move beyond a local, culturalist interpretation of this vaccine as a product of an “African” way of doing science. It explores instead the global ramifications...

... of doing science. It explores instead the global ramifications of the controversy, from Cameroon to California, taking Vanhivax as a symptom of contemporary, global transformations in global biomedicine. This chapter historicizes the concept of culture to better understand discussions of culture...

... of doing science. It explores instead the global ramifications of the controversy, from Cameroon to California, taking Vanhivax as a symptom of contemporary, global transformations in global biomedicine. medical research Africa Afrocentrism HIV biocapitalism ...

... meanings together without doing away with irreconcilable tensions between them. The issue is one of ambivalence and mixed feelings but, even more centrally, that involving epistemological work on the possibilities and impossibilities of knowing. Ambiguity means that things can be both and . This chapter...

... in the current turn against “critique” and “paranoid reading.” Reading McEwan together with the writings of Bruno Latour, it demonstrates the extent to which “postcritique” has been predicated on a rapprochement between the “two cultures”—sciences and humanities—that novelist and theorist alike figure...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...

... (New York: Random House, 2000), 141–64; Peter S. Carmichael, “ ‘Every Map of the Field Cries Out about It’: The Failure of Confederate Artillery at Pickett’s Charge,” and Gary M. Kross, “ ‘I Do Not Believe That Pickett’s Division Would Have Reached Our Line’: Henry J. Hunt and the Union Artillery...