Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

This chapter joins science-technology-society (sts) studies, medical anthropology, and linguistic anthropology in scrutinizing how parents, physicians, nurses, epidemiologists, and journalists constructed competing knowledge claims. It draws on Charles S. Peirce in distinguishing three types. Symbolic dimensions revolved around specifying a diagnostic category that would solve the mystery, thereby privileging the symbolic language of biomedicine. Indexical dimensions positioned all claims in relation to the same dying and dead bodies, projecting different temporal, spatial, scientific, and corporeal forms of directness. Iconic dimensions revolved around making accounts seem like direct reflections of reliable knowledge. The chapter examines participation frameworks (Erving Goffman) that positioned...

This content is only available as PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal