Ghost Protocol: Development and Displacement in Global China
Carlos Rojas is Professor of Chinese Cultural Studies; Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies; and Arts of the Moving Image at Duke University. He is the author, editor, and translator of several books, most recently
Ralph A. Litzinger is Associate Professor of Cultural Anthropology at Duke University and the author of
Carlos Rojas is Professor of Chinese Cultural Studies; Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies; and Arts of the Moving Image at Duke University. He is the author, editor, and translator of several books, most recently
Ralph A. Litzinger is Associate Professor of Cultural Anthropology at Duke University and the author of
“I Am Great Leap Liu!”: Circuits of Labor, Information, and Identity in Contemporary China
-
Published:August 2016
Carlos Rojas, 2016. "“I Am Great Leap Liu!”: Circuits of Labor, Information, and Identity in Contemporary China", Ghost Protocol: Development and Displacement in Global China, Carlos Rojas, Ralph A. Litzinger
Download citation file:
This chapter uses Liu Zhenyun’s 2007 novel Wo jiao Liu Zhenyun [I Am Liu Yuejin] to reflect on shifting understandings of society and identity in contemporary China. The novel follows a migrant worker in contemporary Beijing, who finds himself caught up in a complicated set of overlapping scams that involve an array of other migrant workers, as well as some of the city’s sociopolitical elite. I argue that the work’s migrant workers shuttle back and forth not only between different geographical locations, but also between different sociopolitical conceptions of individual identity. Drawing on psychoanalytic theories of trauma, economic understandings of debt, and philosophical models of denotation and reference, I contend that contemporary Chinese society is shaped by the mutual imbrication of two distinct models of social organization and information management implicit in the traditional Maoist hukou model and the contemporary neoliberal economy, respectively. The novel’s migrant workers illustrate both the far-reaching ramifications of each of these socioeconomic models, as well as their respective limitations.
Advertisement