American Birthright Citizenship Rules and the Exclusion of “Outsiders” from the Political Community
-
Published:January 2017
Margaret D. Stock, 2017. "American Birthright Citizenship Rules and the Exclusion of “Outsiders” from the Political Community", Citizenship in Question: Evidentiary Birthright and Statelessness, Benjamin N. Lawrance, Jacqueline Stevens
Download citation file:
In chapter 10, Margaret D. Stock explores the historical and practical application of “birthright citizenship” and its legal foundation in the Fourteenth Amendment. She discusses the potential, unanticipated consequences of changing America’s long-standing constitutional birthright citizenship rule and examines how a change in the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause could retroactively exclude from citizenship many Americans who have lived in the country their entire lives—including popular politicians discussing this issue nationally. Stock discusses potential problems associated with the practical application of changing the interpretation of the law, and explores and refutes the argument that the Fourteenth Amendment was never intended to cover the children of persons who are not legally present in the United States. By focusing on proposed changes to the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Stock dissects the problems associated with trying to award citizenship based on the “allegiance” held by a child’s parents.
References
Abdel-Whab v. Orthopedic Association of Dutchess. 2006. 415 F. Supp. 2d 293 (S.D. N.Y. 2006).
Arizona Constitution. Article II, § 13. 2012.
Castelano v. Clinton. 2008a. No. 08-cv-00057 (S.D. Tx. 2008). Second Amended Complaint.
Castelano v. Clinton. 2008b. No. 08-cv-00057 (S.D. Tx. 2008). Exh. 1 to Second Amended Complaint.
Castelano v. Clinton. 2009. No. 08-cv-00057 (S.D. Tx. 2009). Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement and Release.
Chu Kheng Lim v. Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs. 1992. 176 CLR 1.
Clark v. Martinez. 2005. 543 U.S. 371.
Convention Debates, Official Report of the National Australasian. 1897. First Session. Adelaide.
Cour Nationale du Droit d’Asile. 2011. No. 10011958. November 2.
Dent v. Holder. 2010. 627 F.3d 365 (9th Cir.).
European Roma Rights Center. 2013a. “For Consideration by the European Commission on the Transposition and Application of the Race Directive and on the Legal Issues Relevant to Roma Integration.”
European Roma Rights Center. 2013b. “Written Comments Concerning Serbia for Consideration by the Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights at the 52nd Session.”
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2009. “Housing Conditions of Roma and Travelers in the European Union—Comparative Report.”
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, UNDP, and European Commission. 2012. “The Situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States: Survey Results at a Glance.”
Garcia v. Clinton 2011. 2011. WL 2173689 (S.D. Tx 2011).
INA § 241(a)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2) (2006).
INS v. Rios-Pineda. 1985. 471 U.S. 444.
Kawakita v. U.S. 1952. 343 U.S. 717, 723–24.
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez. 1963. 372 U.S. 144.
Lok v. INS. 1977. 548 F.2d 37 (Second Circuit).
Lynch v. Clarke. 1844. 1 Sandford 583 (New York).
Mackenzie v. Hare. 1915. 239 U.S. 299.
Mandeli v. Acheson. 1952. 344 U.S. 133.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
Nationality Act 1920 (Commonwealth of Australia).
Naturalisation Act 1903 (Commonwealth of Australia).
Naturalization Act of 1790 (United States of America).
Plyler v. Doe. 1982. 457 U.S. 202.
Re Brian and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 105 ALD 213.
Re Gaigo and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] AATA 590.
Re MIMIA; Ex parte Ame [2005] HCATrans 66 (March 6, 2005).
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Ame (2005) 222 CLR 439.
Rivera v. Albright. 2000. 2000 WL 1514075 (N.D. Ill. 2000).
Roach v. Electoral Commissioner. 2007. 233 CLR 162.
Sandford Scott v. 1857. 60 U.S. 393.
Singh v. The Commonwealth. (2004) 222 CLR 322.
Slaughterhouse Cases. 1873. 83 U.S. 36.
Supreme Court Commissioners. 2009. Ninth Report of the Commissioners. CWP 196/2001. September.
Thin Thai. 1986. “Order Given to Survey KMT Troops, Carry Out Final Registration.” March 13. Radio broadcast in Thai. Translation available through handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA342412.
Trevino v. Clinton. 2007. No. 07-cv-00218 (S.D. Tx.). Declaration of Joe Rivera.
Urtetiqui v. D’Arcy. 1835. 34 U.S. 692.
U.S. v. Leu Jin. 1911. 192 F. 580.
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark. 1898. 169 U.S. 649.
Washington Post. 2001. “Md. Family Ensnared in Immigration Maze.” April 24.
Washington Post. 2003. “U.S. to End Registration Program.” December 2.
Washington Times. 2011. “Willard ‘Mitt’ Mitt Romney.” December 7.
Yamuna and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] AATA 383.
Zadvydas v. Davis. 2001. 533 U.S. 678.