Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

This chapter centers on the difference between historiography and the philosophy of history. The tension between the two bears on the question of tendency, as transhistorical formative force. The actually existing empirical formations populating history come in complex cohabitation. This makes it necessary to evaluate the polyphony of tendential forces at whose crossroads each formation is located. This involves assessing which tendency is most intensely in-forming a given formation’s functioning. Processual tendencies must be distilled from their historical in-mixing with other tendencies, and with other orders (systems of function, structures of meaning). This is done through an evaluation of the ideal end points animating and orienting them. The chapter drafts William James’s concept of the processual “terminus,” a key element of his radical empiricism, into service toward this end.

This content is only available as PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal