Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

This chapter attends to the reception of Merleau-Ponty’s “flesh” in continental philosophy. It begins by explicating Michel Foucault’s treatment of flesh, which Merleau-Ponty understands to be a product of Christian discourses about sin. It then turns to philosophers who are explicitly troubled by “flesh” in the writings of Merleau-Ponty. Nancy worries that Merleau-Ponty’s “flesh” is a metaphysical concept that subordinates differentiated bodies to a universalizing explanatory principle; for Luce Irigaray, the appearance of flesh in Merleau-Ponty evidences the suppression of the maternal feminine and overemphasizes the masculine world of visibility.

This content is only available as PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal