The transcription of speech into a graphic code is a basic procedure in both dialectology and sociolinguistics, and typically, it is this graphic analog of speech that forms the data for analysis in both disciplines. The act of transcription, however, affects linguistic data in subtle,difficult-to-detect ways. This paper demonstrates some of those effects by examining impressionistic phonetic data in American linguistic atlases. The paper identifies three sources of transcriber effects in the data: (1)conceptual differences regarding the phonetic status of particular sounds(e.g., offglides of diphthongs) and how they should be transcribed, (2)normative differences regarding the phonetic values of particular symbols, and(3) changing scribal practices as transcribers discover the importance of phonetic details that they had previously overlooked. When transcriber effects such as these are not identified and accounted for in the analysis of the data, they can create misleading results.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| February 01 2005
SOME EFFECTS OF TRANSCRIBERS ON DATA IN DIALECTOLOGY
American Speech (2005) 80 (1): 3–21.
GUY BAILEY, JAN TILLERY, CLAIRE ANDRES; SOME EFFECTS OF TRANSCRIBERS ON DATA IN DIALECTOLOGY. American Speech 1 February 2005; 80 (1): 3–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-80-1-3
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In