...James Dawes By Wendy Steiner. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. 1995. xi, 251 pp. Paper,$14.00. By Martin Halliwell. New York: Palgrave. 2001. viii, 264 pp. $62.00. 2003 220 American Literature acteristically American...

... The Scandal of Pleasure: Art in an Age of Fundamentalism. By Wendy Steiner. Chi- cago: Univ. of Chicago Press. 1995. xi, 251 pp. Paper, $14.00. Modernism and Morality: Ethical Devices in European and American Fiction.By...

... Am: Writings and Lectures, 1911–1945 . Edited by Meyerwitz Patricia . London : Peter Owen . Steiner Wendy . 1995 . “ Mother .” London Review of Books 17 , no. 20 : https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v17/n20/wendy-steiner/mother . Stendhal Renate . 1994 . Gertrude Stein...

... for securing cultural prestige within the literary milieu of Anglo-American modernism, Moore’s bewildering texts are instead mimetic of the complex topography of the learning process. Among our recent theorists of literary difficulty, George Steiner—through his notion of ‘‘tactical’’ difficulty—may come...

...- erns such as Stagecoach and Union Pacific. Uncommon Readers: Denis Donoghue, Frank Kermode, George Steiner, and the Tradi- tion of the Common Reader. By Christopher J. Knight. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press. 2003. xiii, 506 pp. $50.00. Knight presents the unique critical independence...

... between a major strain of modernist abstraction and the male body. Sedgwick’s hypothesis suggests that the abstractionist ideologies of modernism exiled not only Venus, as Wendy Steiner has suggested, but Ganymede as well.58 What was rejected, according to Sedgwick, was “not the figuration of just...

... movements. The noisy appeal of nothingness licensed a cottage industry of articles and books on the relationship of silence to artistic practice, including George Steiner’s Language and Silence ([1967] 1998 ) and Ihab Hassan’s The Literature of Silence ( 1967 ). For Sontag and company, silence became...

... to the novel. Indeed, this claim remains consistent even among those who argue that the novel is not principally concerned with technology (Mattessich 2002 ), that it is representative of a now-exhausted postmodernity (Steiner 1999 ), or that it is as global (Robbins 2011 ) or comparative (Saint-Amour 2010...

.... Press of Mississippi, 1996), 106. Delany himself, under the pseudonym K. Leslie Steiner, notices this particular ambiguity, showing how the act of deter- mining this racial description is a way of creating coherence in the world of the novel. He writes, “Our general tendency...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

... that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some inevitable ques- tions...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

...). This is a familiar position that has been theorized by such prominent thinkers as George Steiner and Daniel Boyarin (to whom Omer-Sherman repeatedly pays tribute). However, using this position as an axiom rather than as an object of inquiry, Omer- Sherman’s book raises but fails to adequately address some...

... of the Foreign, 99). Fuller admired Novalis and shared his sentiment, though not his conclusions. Novalis sets up a metaphorical understanding of translation as any act of inter- pretation, inaugurating the school of such translation theorists as Georg Steiner. Although Fuller gives...

...’’ edition came out, and several other Bradford editions soon followed. In all, sixteen Philadelphia editions came out—nine from Bell, six from the Bradfords, and one German edition from Steiner and Cist. But even within these certainties, key questions remain. How many copies were produced in each...